EvalUit works with CCBHCs on defined projects, implementation builds, and ongoing evaluation support. Start with the problem. The engagement can be shaped around what your clinic needs.
These are starting points, not rigid packages. Scope depends on the clinic, systems, reporting environment, and maturity of the evaluation function.
Find the gaps behind unreliable reporting, manual workarounds, unclear ownership, and inconsistent measurement.
Validated readiness profile, evidence-based findings, risk register, prioritized 30/60/90-day roadmap, and executive summary.
Assess your readiness →Build or rebuild the operating system behind CCBHC evaluation and performance management.
A practical evaluation system your team can maintain, use, and explain.
Build the function →Move from a long list of available metrics to a focused set of measures that support accountability and management.
KPI register, measure specifications, dashboard structure, and a repeatable review process.
Strengthen measurement →Turn off-target results and recurring operational problems into structured improvement work.
Focused improvement plans, review tools, action trackers, and evidence of whether changes worked.
Move from data to action →Build and manage the evaluation and reporting infrastructure required for CCBHC grant performance while keeping the work useful between submission deadlines.
Grant-aligned evaluation plans, sampling documentation, reporting controls, dashboards, analyses, required-report inputs, and decision-ready findings.
Explore full-service evaluation →Experienced CCBHC evaluation leadership for organizations that need sustained capacity without building the full function internally.
New or growing CCBHCs, organizations with limited internal evaluation capacity, or teams that need specialized support during implementation or transition.
Discuss ongoing support →EvalUit is intentionally specialized. The work is designed around CCBHC implementation, evaluation, reporting, measurement, and improvement.
Clinics strengthening evaluation, reporting, data quality, KPIs, or CQI after implementation.
Organizations building the evaluation and measurement infrastructure needed early in implementation.
Behavioral health organizations assessing what their current data, workflows, and evaluation capacity will need to support.
Teams that need consistent definitions, governance, reporting, and performance review across programs or sites.
The process is structured enough to create accountability and flexible enough to fit the realities of each organization.
Clarify the problem, requirements, stakeholders, systems, and decisions the work needs to support.
Review evidence, workflows, data, documentation, and current-state practices before recommending a solution.
Create the specifications, tools, workflows, dashboards, governance, or evaluation structure needed.
Put the work into practice with clear ownership, documentation, and usable processes.
Review what is working, address what is not, and strengthen the system over time.
See how planning, reporting, quality measurement, analysis, and CQI fit together.
Read →Turn requirements and evaluation questions into a usable operating plan.
Read →What to look for when the organization needs outside CCBHC evaluation capacity.
Read →